home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT1501>
- <title>
- Oct. 31, 1994: Books:Eco Illogical
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Oct. 31, 1994 New Hope for Public Schools
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ARTS & MEDIA/BOOKS, Page 81
- Eco Illogical
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> Pamphleteer P.J. O'Rourke mocks environmental woes
- </p>
- <p>By Eugene Linden
- </p>
- <p> Very early on in All the Trouble in the World (Grove/Atlantic;
- 340 pages; $22), P.J. O'Rourke's look at "the lighter side"
- of overpopulation, famine, ecological disaster and other global
- environmental woes, the reader begins to wonder whether somewhere
- between writing Republican Party Reptile and this latest effort
- the author suffered a stroke. Left intact are O'Rourke's accustomed
- descriptive flair and facility for throwaway lines--" `dying
- like flies' is not a simile you'd use in Somalia. The flies
- wax prosperous and lead full lives." Gone, however, is any faculty
- for building an argument.
- </p>
- <p> In this disjointed collection of essays and articles, as in
- earlier books, O'Rourke assumes the role of libertarian praise
- singer, extolling the virtues of free markets and heaping scorn
- on the evils of clumsy, intrusive Big Government. He takes the
- position that despite the whining of enviros, people throughout
- the world have never been better off and that doomsayers who
- exaggerate the threat of ecological collapse are motivated by
- self-interest and a socialist agenda. In essence, he is offering
- the Wall Street Journal editorial page with a laugh track.
- </p>
- <p> O'Rourke serves up his witticisms with plenty of statistics
- that support his views, and a reader might reasonably assume
- that he has undertaken exhaustive research. In fact, the book
- betrays a disturbing ignorance. The World Bank, for instance,
- does not squander money by making loans to poor nations "that
- will be paid back when the Pope sits shiva." Were it only so--then the bank might stop making its ecologically dubious
- investments. Much of the recent criticism leveled at the institution
- has been that it makes too much money from those loans, not
- too little.
- </p>
- <p> All right, reading a political humorist for details about the
- World Bank is as sensible as studying Oliver Stone's movie JFK
- for the facts of the Kennedy assassination. O'Rourke is after
- larger truths. But even the internal consistency of All the
- Trouble in the World is skewed. For example, to score points
- off former communists, O'Rourke catalogs the vast costs of pollution
- in the Czech Republic, but elsewhere he calls an unpolluted
- environment a "luxury good" and derides clean-up programs in
- the U.S. In one part of the book pollution helps trees; in another
- it kills them.
- </p>
- <p> Like an out-of-shape fighter, O'Rourke chooses to pummel stiffs
- and has-beens. He wastes pages going after 50 Simple Things
- You Can Do to Save the Planet, a quickly forgotten by-product
- of 1992 Earth Day hype. When he does take on a substantial foe,
- like Vice President Al Gore, he becomes almost hysterical, lumping
- Gore with Nazis and other totalitarians for observing that the
- world may be forced to respond to the global environmental crisis
- in a "collective, coordinated way."
- </p>
- <p> The book's assertions will have many greens reaching for their
- beta-blockers. Among the most provocative: the argument that
- Bangladesh's problems must not stem from overpopulation since
- the city of Freemont, California, is just as crowded and yet
- sustains a pleasant, middle-class life-style; the idea that
- most Amazon Indians would rather move out of the rain forest;
- a description of Thoreau as a "sanctimonius beatnik." Still,
- O'Rourke is funny. In the Amazon he encounters one Yagua Indian
- with a grass skirt so elaborate that "he was lucky he hadn't
- been declared an endangered ecosystem from the waist down."
- </p>
- <p> The most maddening aspect of All the Trouble in the World is
- that many of the issues O'Rourke raises deserve real discussion.
- Governments do tend to screw up well-intentioned environmental
- programs, just as they screw up everything else; it is difficult
- to assess the risks of environmental threats; markets and property
- rights play a vital if complicated role in environmental issues.
- However, serious debate--or even productive humorous debate--requires reason and a fair use of facts. "Logic is so annoying,"
- O'Rourke cracks. Illogic is even more so.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-